Adams v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
| New York Western District Court | |
| Judge: | John L Sinatra, Jr |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00410 |
| Nature of Suit | 480 Other Statutes - Consumer Credit |
| Cause | 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Case Filed: | May 12, 2025 |
| Last checked: Monday May 12, 2025 5:09 PM EDT |
|
Defendant
Credit Acceptance Corporation
|
|
|
Defendant
Equifax Information Services LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc
|
|
|
Defendant
LVNV Funding LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
Self Financial, Inc
|
|
|
Defendant
TransUnion LLC
|
|
|
Plaintiff
David D. Adams
916 Prospect Ave
Bufalo, NY 14213 |
| Docket last updated: 05/12/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
| Monday, May 12, 2025 | ||
| 2 | 2
motion
Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Mon 05/12 2:27 PM
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David D. Adams. (TMK) |
|
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Mon 05/12 2:26 PM
COMPLAINT against Credit Acceptance Corporation, Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc, LVNV Funding LLC, Self Financial, Inc, TransUnion LLC, filed by David D. Adams. (TMK) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet
|
||
|
utility
Remark
Mon 05/12 2:55 PM
Remark: Plaintiff has been given a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program Information and ADR Notification. (TMK) |
||
|
adr
Automatic Referral to Mediation
Mon 05/12 2:57 PM
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's[LINK:ADR webpage] and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at[LINK:adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov] . Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the [LINK:ADR Plan] and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) |
||