Lebowitz v. 14490 Cedar, LLC et al.
| Ohio Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Pamela A Barker |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00929 |
| Nature of Suit | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Cause | 29:203 Equal Pay Act |
| Case Filed: | May 08, 2025 |
| Last checked: Thursday May 08, 2025 2:08 PM EDT |
|
Defendant
14490 Cedar, LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
Cleveland Restaurant Management Group, LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
Martin Moran
|
|
|
Defendant
Paul Tomko
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Gary Lebowitz
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 12 hours ago |
| Thursday, May 08, 2025 | ||
| 2 | 2
oth_evt
Summons Issued
Thu 05/08 12:07 PM
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon 14490 Cedar, LLC, 14490 Cedar, LLC (Statutory Agent), Cleveland Restaurant Management Group, LLC, Cleveland Restaurant Management Group, LLC (Statutory Agent), Martin Moran, Paul Tomko. (F,AW) |
|
|
Att: 1
Magistrate Consent Form
|
||
| 1 | 1
58
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Thu 05/08 11:29 AM
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Damages with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $405.00, receipt number AOHNDC-13089413. Filed by Gary Lebowitz. (Spitz, Brian) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Exhibit Consulting Agreement,
|
||
|
Att: 4
Exhibit Non-Competition Agreement,
|
||
|
Att: 5
Exhibit Agreement Notes,
|
||
|
Att: 6
Exhibit Notes,
|
||
|
Att: 7
Exhibit Duties,
|
||
|
Att: 8
Exhibit Messages,
|
||
|
Att: 9
Exhibit Add. Messages
|
||
|
utility
Add and Terminate Judge
Thu 05/08 11:59 AM
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (F,AW) |
||
|
oth_evt
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge
Thu 05/08 12:00 PM
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (F,AW) |
||
|
order
Order
Thu 05/08 12:04 PM
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 5/8/2025. (P,K) |
||